Ibangua Investments Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes [2025] KETAT 42 (KLR)
Burden of Proof
“The Tribunal comes to the inescapable conclusion that the Appellant did not discharge its burden of proof as required by providing competent and sufficient documentation to prove the Respondent’s assessment and objection decision wrong, excessive or erroneous.”
Access this Resource
Choose how you'd like to unlock this content and start learning today.
Full Category Access
Unlock every resource in this category with a monthly subscription. Perfect for ongoing learning.
OR
Single Resource
Just want this one? Buy it individually for a one-time small fee.