Ibangua Investments Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes [2025] KETAT 42 (KLR)
Burden of Proof
“The Tribunal comes to the inescapable conclusion that the Appellant did not discharge its burden of proof as required by providing competent and sufficient documentation to prove the Respondent’s assessment and objection decision wrong, excessive or erroneous.”
Access Restricted Content
This document contains deep analysis, precedent citations and expert commentary reserved for our premium members.
View our pricing plansAlready have a subscription? Sign In